Radical Islam
Radical Islam Back to Lessons Page

01.05.2011: A psychological issue...

... which came from a Google Search for the author/interviewee.

... inspired by this email I received...

FYI the study was made by Nicolia Sennels

Nicolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first-cousins.

This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world. This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.

The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health. According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%. The numbers are equally devastating in other important Muslim countries: 67% in Saudi Arabia , 64% in Jordan and Kuwait , 63% in Sudan , 60% in Iraq , and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar .

According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK , they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects. The risk of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher.

Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor. Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of consanguinous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as retarded, increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages.

(Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.) In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army. Sennels says that the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world. He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does. In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.

Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies.

Only nine Muslims have every won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the Peace Prize. According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research (measured by articles per million inhabitants).

In Denmark, Sennels native country, Muslim children are grossly over represented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background. Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of school children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.

Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of the patients in Denmark's biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background.

The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.

Sennels concludes:

There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims' religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. (This has produced) overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.

Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims. Simple Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous religion. These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish public polices dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building of mosques in the U.S. Let's hope America wakes up before a blind naïveté about the reality of Islam destroys what remains of our Christian culture and our domestic tranquility.


06.03.2008:

Words of Warning to the West [excerpt]

By Joel Richardson, WorldNetDaily, May 19, 2008

"The United States is about to be tried. At stake are the very freedoms that we all hold so dear. On March 27, the United Nations Human Rights Council voted to adopt resolution 7/19 on “Combating defamation of religions.” In one of the most Orwellian resolutions ever passed, this so-called “Human Rights Council” condemns “Islamophobia,” which includes any, “attempts to identify Islam with terrorism, violence and human rights violations.”

Think about this for a moment. Suppose that I tell you that according to sacred Islamic tradition, Muhammad himself stated that those who leave Islam should be punished by execution. And suppose that I also point out that all four of the Orthodox Sunni schools of Islamic jurisprudence as well as the Shiites interpret Muhammad's statements to mean that death is the appropriate punishment for leaving Islam. According to this resolution, I should be arrested and tried for a “criminal” act. Free speech anyone?

In other words, according to the U.N. Human Rights Council, criticism of Islam should be globally forbidden under penalty of law. Should we be surprised to discover that the resolution was introduced by the Organization of the Islamic Conference, or OIC, an umbrella organization of 57 Islamic nations? The 58-page document calls for “the international community to come up with a binding legal instrument to fight the menace of Islamophobia” so that “the right to freedom of expression” not be used as a license for “insulting the sacred religious symbols of Islam.” The “freedom of expression … may be subject to certain restrictions … necessary for the respect of the rights or reputations of others.” In other words, expressing a negative opinion about Islam in public, and maybe even in private, could land you in jail."

In a word... BS! Another testimony to the moral failure of the "United Nations" Organization.


05.30.2008: If you still think they're "good guys" take a look at sites like this one...
03.31.2007: the United Nations Human Rights Commission is now a member of the Group of Hypocrisy. the UN should be abolished.
Hezbollah and all other fundamentalist sects, gangs, groups or movements are based on Bullshit: Lies. Nothing else. All of them.
I believe that no matter what they say, every comment they make should be met with one reply: "Bullshit."

05.07.2008: Can you Trust a Gallup Poll? Maybe... but Figures Lie and Liars Figure. Make sure you read the second page...
05.07.2008: What a wonderful story, whether it's true or not....

An ingenious example of speech and politics occurred recently at the U.N. and made the world community smile.

A representative from Israel began: "Before beginning my talk I want to tell you something about Moses. When he struck the rock and it brought forth water, he thought, 'What a good opportunity to have a bath!' He removed his clothes, put them aside on the rock and entered the water. When he got out and wanted to dress, his clothes had vanished. A Palestinian had stolen them."

The Palestinian representative jumped up furiously and shouted, "What are you talking about? The Palestinians weren't there then."

The Israeli representative smiled and said, "And now that I have made that clear, I will begin my speech."


Take a look at it this way....

Or maybe this way "Maps of War"

Now tell me... Who "owned" which land and when? So, who should "own" it now???


Here's another quick overview:


WTF?!


Start at this link if you think Muslims are a culture endangered by Jews.

From aish.com,
"The difference between us and the terrorists is clear:
We endanger ourselves to protect their civilians.
They endanger their own civilians to protect themselves."


12.06.2007: Oh, the sweet, kind, non-aggressive Muslims.... Sure. And their spelling sucks, too... :)


06.04.2007: Quote from Ken...

No Arab cares in the slightest little bit for the Palestinians: they are the definition of "they do not sow nor do they reap". The only reason they get any publicity or sympathy at all is because "the enemy of my enemy is my friend", and since the Palestinians hate America and Israel, they are instantly and automatically the noblest, wisest, most oppressed and all around best people in the world, at least according to the American and European left, all of whom will embrace any enemy of GWB no matter their actual politics, contribution to the world at large, or moral standards.

Your google [Palestine refugees in Iran] is good, but also go back and see how much money the Arab states contributed to the PLO over the years when Arafat was in power: it approaches $0 (Saudi Arabia did contribute prior to that time). Lots of rhetoric supporting them, lots of weapons slipped in the back door, but no money to actually improve their standard of living, nor any land that they could use to actually live. The Arab states are using them for cannon fodder and a rallying point for anti-American sentiment, but don't care in the slightest little bit for them in any other way.

Yep.


As a friend of mine put it recently,

I've noticed something recently in the media's reporting 
of the rockets fired into Israel and the Israeli bombing in Lebanon.... 
when discussing the "results" of Israeli bombings/attacks, there's 
usually a "human/emotional" touch about how people lost family 
members, towns had parts destroyed and the horror of the results 
and collateral damage of war. When it comes to the rocket attacks 
against Israel the tone/tenor of the report tends to be more clinical, 
statistical and mechanical -- such as "Hezbollah fired 100 rockets into 
northern Israel, hit a couple of towns, 6 killed, 20 wounded." Period. 

"And now onto the weather"......
 
Both versions are likely similarly true and accurate, but the "spin" is quite different.

Then add this to the mix....

and don't forget this one...


From my friend Stuart in Switzerland, 08.19.2006:

Hezbollah pays out 12k$ in US 100 dollar bills to people without houses.
- the irony of it all! Why not Lebanese Zlotys or something or Syrian whatevers? US DOLLARS?
I thought they hated everything western? Except money, mobile phones, antibiotics...
They are probably good forgeries anyway

I'll bet you're right about the money being counterfeit, Stuart! Now there's the rub... rewarding the victims of your own stupidity with value-less money which is an imitation of the currency of your most hated enemy. Somebody's lobotomy was successful... whose? Hezbollah's leaders'!


Read some history....

Do you remember Eric Hoffer? He was a longshoreman who turned into a philosopher, wrote columns for newspapers and some books. Eric Hoffer was a non-Jewish American social philosopher. He was born in 1902 and died in 1983, after writing nine books and winning the Presidential Medal of Freedom. His first book, The True Believer, published in 1951, was widely recognized as a classic. If I remember correctly, he even taught at U.C.L.A. Here is one of his columns from 1968.

CAN YOU BELIEVE..... This article was written 34 years ago!!! Some truths never change.

ISRAEL'S PECULIAR POSITION by Eric Hoffer (LA Times 5/26/68)

The Jews are a peculiar people: things permitted to other nations are forbidden to the Jews.

Other nations drive out thousands, even millions of people and there is no refugee problem. Russia did it, Poland and Czechoslovakia did it, Turkey threw out a million Greeks, and Algeria a million Frenchman. Indonesia threw out heaven knows how many Chinese-and no one says a word about refugees. But in the case of Israel the displaced Arabs have become eternal refugees. Everyone insists that Israel must take back every single Arab. Arnold Toynbee calls the displacement of the Arabs an atrocity greater than any committed by the Nazis. Other nations when victorious on the battlefield dictate peace terms. But when Israel is victorious it must sue for peace

Everyone expects the Jews to be the only real Christians in this world. Other nations when they are defeated survive and recover but should Israel be defeated it would be destroyed. Had Nasser triumphed last June [1967] he would have wiped Israel off the map, and no one would have lifted a finger to save the Jews. No commitment to the Jews by any government, including our own, is worth the paper it is written on

There is a cry of outrage all over the world when people die in Vietnam or when two Blacks are executed in Rhodesia. But when Hitler slaughtered Jews no one remonstrated with him. The Swedes, who are ready to break off diplomatic relations with America because of what we do in Vietnam, did not let out a peep when Hitler was slaughtering Jews. They sent Hitler choice iron ore, and ball bearings, and serviced his troop trains to Norway.

The Jews are alone in the world. If Israel survives, it will be solely because of Jewish efforts. And Jewish resources. Yet at this moment Israel is our only reliable and unconditional ally. We can rely more on Israel than Israel can rely on us. And one has only to imagine what would have happened last summer [1967] had the Arabs and their Russian backers won the war to realize how vital the survival of Israel is to America and the West in general.

I have a premonition that will not leave me; as it goes with Israel so will it go with all of us. Should Israel perish the holocaust will be upon us.


First rev: 08.18.2006; © Copyright 1999-2008 by plusaf. All rights reserved.
Email: ; Subject = "Hezbollah = Bullshit"