Project Aquarius           rev. 11.27.2008

You read it here first: Project Aquarius.

First, the underlying conditions and needs:

These situations should be handled in a way that supports migration and growth of the population, but to do so effectively will require a new mind-set and a very large capital investment. The rewards for these investments can be as far-reaching as those of the creation of the US Interstate Highway System, which led to a growth in interstate commerce and transcontinental availability of products which was impossible or prohibitively expensive before the highway system was put in place.

We need to begin to think of a similarly-large investment for our nation's future success and economic health.

That is what the Project Aquarius goals are:

What kind of solutions could provide this?

As weather patterns change, some areas become wetter or drier through the years. The average rainfall or water supply can vary from "plentiful" to "drought emergency" over the span of just a few years.

While the idea of a nationwide system may appear daunting at first, there are areas of the country where this is done on a fairly large scale today. For example, the city of San Francisco, CA, gets a large amount of its water supply from the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir in the Sierra Nevada Mountains. The water is piped well over a hundred miles from the mountains to a reservoir south of San Francisco, from which it is drawn to supply local needs. Similarly, Los Angeles derives much of its water from reservoirs and rivers which are far from the city itself. The mid-scale feasibility has been demonstrated for decades.

What is needed now is to have the vision to see that a nationwide system would have far-reaching benefits for the entire country, too.

Many challenges must be overcome, similar to those overcome during the planning and construction of the Interstate Highway System:

The need for this kind of solution is nearly self-evident, but it will take a large mind-set shift for people to seriously consider the implementation of it. It will cost huge sums of money. The benefits of lessened flood damage to communities, cities and states and the lowering of fiscal and personal impact on them is just the start. A heavy rainstorm in one region of the US could mean additional water supply for cities and farms far away. The lower cost of this water, which normally would run to the sea taking homes and lives with it, would be a benefit to everyone in the country forever after. Please give it some consideration.

Other Considerations and Ideas...


10.01.2007: A funny thing happened to me today: an appliance salesman commented that he "couldn't understand why nobody was dredging any of the lakes or reservoirs, now that the drought is here, big-time, and the water levels are so low. It would make so much sense to increase the capacities of the lakes and reservoirs so they'd have more capacity to supply water to the cities in the future!"

Here's the funny part: I replied, "Yeah, that was the exact subject of the first letter to the editor that I ever wrote to the Raleigh, NC, News & Observer, almost exactly two years ago, right after we moved here. They ignored it then, too."


First rev: 09.01.2007