Obama - 46
Site Navigation Bar
Home Page The Lessons Falk's Laws Letters To... Woodcraft About Me plusaf Links Crazy Ideas? For Sale
Golden Rescue No, It's Not! Books->Movies   No Shit! WTF?! News In Memoriam... Donations

07.18.2010: Who need conspiracy theories with a president like this? ... or, How can you possibly be any less subtle?

According to the NY Times...


WASHINGTON --- When Congress required most Americans to obtain health insurance or pay a penalty, Democrats denied that they were creating a new tax. But in court, the Obama administration and its allies now defend the requirement as an exercise of the government's "power to lay and collect taxes."

And that power, they say, is even more sweeping than the federal power to regulate interstate commerce.

Administration officials say the tax argument is a linchpin of their legal case in defense of the health care overhaul and its individual mandate, now being challenged in court by more than 20 states and several private organizations.

Under the legislation signed by President Obama in March, most Americans will have to maintain “minimum essential coverage” starting in 2014. Many people will be eligible for federal subsidies to help them pay premiums.

In a brief defending the law, the Justice Department says the requirement for people to carry insurance or pay the penalty is "a valid exercise" of Congress's power to impose taxes.

Congress can use its taxing power "even for purposes that would exceed its powers under other provisions" of the Constitution, the department said. For more than a century, it added, the Supreme Court has held that Congress can tax activities that it could not reach by using its power to regulate commerce.

While Congress was working on the health care legislation, Mr. Obama refused to accept the argument that a mandate to buy insurance, enforced by financial penalties, was equivalent to a tax.

"For us to say that you've got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase," the president said last September, in a spirited exchange with George Stephanopoulos on the ABC News program "This Week."

When Mr. Stephanopoulos said the penalty appeared to fit the dictionary definition of a tax, Mr. Obama replied, "I absolutely reject that notion."

... from an email from a friend of mine...

Pelosi/Reid/Obama may have found a way to bypass the courts on this one.

Remember Obama et al swearing up and down that they would not raise taxes on anyone earning less than $250K?

Remember Obama et al telling us that the penalty for not buying the mandated goods and services that they want you to buy is not a tax?

Well, that was then and this is now.

According to the NY Times, Obama et al are now prepared to go into court and swear up and down that the penalty *IS* a tax, because Congress's ability to tax things is not subject to court rulings. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/18/health/policy/18health.html?_r=1&ref=politics.

So it isn't a tax when Obama doesn't want it to be, but it is a tax when he does want it to be.

"Was he lying then or is he lying now" doesn't even begin to approach the unmitigated gall and chutzpah of this sleazy tactic...

I would say "un-freakin-believable", but unfortunately with this crowd it is all too believable.

First rev: 07.18.2010